I am taking a media class at Marylhurst this term. It has been a fascinating exploration of the theories surrounding media and society. Did you know that it is a mistaken notion that violence in the media is a cause of more violence in our communities? It has been shown that media violence does not cause more violence. What it does cause is the perception that we are under constant threat of violence. If the news reports primarily the violence happening in the city we live in and if the movies we watch and series we enjoy revolve around murder and mayhem, than it is not a far-fetched idea to understand that we perceive violence as an epidemic. (Obviously in some cultures and nations violence is a daily threat, but for the average American it is not.)
Perception is reality, goes the saying. The messaging we allow to filter our experiences will rule the way we think and thus, the way we behave.
It gets even more interesting when we consider the source of the messaging. If a society or institution promotes an idea as a norm and if the general consensus of the masses is to accept it as the norm, than whether it's fair or just or even common sense, The Idea becomes normative and unchallenged.
For instance, let's take the institutional church's treatment of women. Those in the point positions of messaging in the church have primarily been men. They are the ones who primarily have the influence and power to affect the stories the faithful integrate into the heart and mind. If one is conditioned to accept without question the stories and values of a religion's tradition, then there develops a tendency known in the academic world as hegemony. Wikipedia defines hegemony like this:
Hegemony (pronounced he-jeh-moh-nee) is manifested in all kinds of ways, such as back in the day when there were White Only theaters and drinking fountains in some parts of the American South. Even though it was unjust the majority of society consented to it by obeying it. Another example of hegemony is war. Though the majority of a nation may reject war on ethical and moral grounds, they consent to it by virtue of the powers that be declaring war.the political, economic, ideological or cultural power exerted by a dominant group over other groups. It requires the consent of the majority to keep the dominant group in power. (red my emphasis)
In the same way women are subjected to hegemony by consenting to allow it to continue in the institution known as The Church. Women allow it - and so do their men - by consenting through resignation, silence, acquiescence, and agreement. The Church, by and large, says women may not have the same degree of influence as men since the Bible has been interpreted to message this for as far back as anyone can remember. It is normative. People of all kinds of creeds, socioeconomic status, education, etc... passively sit and listen to sermons about women needing to submit and let the men lead for this the divine order of things according to the bible. Women who accept from those in power messaging us to remain submissive (for this is a high quality in a Christ honoring woman) unknowingly perpetuate the oppression of being less than.
A number of years ago a woman I know was deeply involved in the swirl of religious activity at her church. She had a reputation for her piety and enjoyed a certain amount of admiration from some of the most prominent members of her faith community. One day one of the pastoral staff paid her what she considered a high compliment. "All the pastors at this church regard you with high respect because of your submission."
The woman glowed with happiness as she was praised and affirmed. She wanted so much to be a good and proper Christian woman. This pastor -- kind-hearted as he may have been -- reinforced the hegemonic message that Women Are To Submit to Their Men Who Must Lead. What troubles me the most, though, is not his misplaced words of praise, but rather her misplaced sense of accomplishment. This is a textbook example of hegemony, of those in power ruling over the majority through consent. The story continues to be the same story, generation after generation, because we allow it to be so.
If a woman or a man begins to speak up in opposition to this story they are often portrayed as straying from biblical truth and by default, God's Divine Order of Things. Who can argue with God? This is the outrage, the absurdity, in my opinion, of the hegemonic system of inequity towards women what is meant to be the kingdom of God. Apparently the king of this kingdom demeans half the citizens to the back of the bus based on gender. Merit and talent, gifting and passion are not qualities that make any difference. It's a little chromosome that determines your status in his kingdom.
A teenage girl once sobbed in shame as she revealed that she felt a stirring to pursue pastoral training after high school. Her whole life she had heard the story, the messaging, that women submit and men lead. She heard it in the way the people of her church treated one another, for every female Sunday school teacher she had and every male elder and pastor listed in the church bulletin. She saw it in her home, in the way her mom deferred to her father for significant decision making. So when the desire to be a pastor emerged from her young, tender heart it spun her out. It did not match the story she knew.
"What's wrong with me?" she cried as she revealed this desire as if confessing a sexual misstep. "Girls can't be pastors!" We talked long and hard about other points of view concerning women and the pulpit. She had not allowed herself to even think about such possibility since this would defy biblical teaching about God's divine order. She was locked up, heart and soul, in a hegemonic worldview that threatened to hold hostage her mind, self-image and future vocation. It would take an inner revolution for her to decide to break rank with tradition and announce her intention to go to seminary.
Eventually, however, she succumbed to the pressure of keeping the status quo. She buried deep her perverted desire to be a pastor, and in doing so, buried a part of herself. The teenage girl grew to be a woman who was resigned to her fate to serve someone else's dream.
I tried to help her change her story. I really did. But in the end, she is the one who has to decide which way to turn the page. It still weighs heavy on my heart that she stopped turning the pages at all.
It may not seem very consequential, this idea of women and power and influence in religious societies, especially in the West. Are not women enjoying a greater degree of privilege and voice than ever before?
Yes and no. It is true that there is much that has been discarded in many faith denominations in regard to women. I maintain, though, that it has been precursory. In other words, that it's a beginning but certainly not the end. It's not enough when women still look to men to give us influence or our say on the platform. Women have relegated their permission to speak and be heard to men. We wait for men to hand us the mic or invite us to the pulpit. We accept the inequity of how a woman is assigned subservience in the name of her god.
Women like me have chosen to close the book just like the young teenage girl. I am part of the problem. It is Me. I rant and rave about the injustice of it all. I complain with my women friends around kitchen tables about the unfairness of the good ole' boys club with their No Girls Allowed sign hanging on the tree house door. We have been barking up the wrong tree.
It's long overdue to burn the f*cker down.




10 comments:
Pam. We HAVE to spend some time together.
If a woman or a man begins to speak up in opposition to this story they are often portrayed as straying from biblical truth and by default, God's Divine Order of Things. Who can argue with God? Th...is is the outrage, the absurdity, in my opinion, of the hegemonic system of inequity towards women what is meant to be the kingdom of God. Apparently the king of this kingdom demeans half the citizens to the back of the bus based on gender. Merit and talent, gifting and passion are not qualities that make any difference. It's a little chromosome that determines your status in his kingdom.
I want to pick your brain and process. Otherwise known as coffee and convo. If I was a smoker, I'd say coffee convo and cigs.
Who can argue with God? This is the outrage, the absurdity
One hegemonic way, one homophobic, exclusionary faith; one salvation; one bible; one God
@Molly, totally let's make it happen. You have my number. TEXT ME!
@chris, well, it's just not supposed to be that way IMO. This is one big reason why I have my little outpost in this corner of the blogosphere. Just trying to offer a different POV that will hopefully add to the symphony of voices that are saying, It's time to burn this f*cker down
And sometimes people replace one hegemony with another directly opposite one.
As you are doing here.
Very few people think for themselves. They either go along or react, but rarely think on their own.
@anon, I am not sure what you mean. If a counter hegemonic POV is considered intrinsically hegemonic in and of itself, than there would seem to be a universal system of hegemony wherever one goes in this world...which, now that I say that out loud, is perhaps the point you are getting at?
That is something to think about. Must we negotiate and counter hegemonic realities wherever we find ourselves?
Heady stuff.
What I know is that for many years I have consented to the subservient treatment of women in the evangelical circles I ran in and even defended it myself with biblical discourse. It is mostly a majority view in Christendom and is mostly perpetuated by those who are not women. The absurd part in this equation is not the men who traditionally have held the highest positions of power in the institutional church, the absurdity of it to me is the invoking of God's authority to make it so.
I have a problem with that. Hegemonic or whatever, I have a problem with that. I am not a pastor. I am not a victim of church abuse. I am not a frustrated church woman who hit the stained-glass barrier. I am a Christ follower who has held a long gaze at the inequity of women in the modern church.
Thanks for adding your POV here and I hope you'll unpack more of your thoughts. You have my focused attention.
Ahem, If I may share bit from THE Word itself, maybe we can get at the root of what actually needs burning ;) I'm sure you have these verses hidden deep in a dark corner of your heart but lets bring them to the surface for the sake of conversation.
1 Cor. 14:34-35
"Let your women keep silent in the churches: For it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also says the law. And if they will learn anything, let them ask their husband at home: For it is a shame for a woman to speak in the church."
Now on to 1 Tim 2:12
I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.
There doesn't seem to be any room for argument here. We have THE Word specifically stating the grounds for male leadership. Even if one were to call my argument a misinterpretation of scripture, one would still need to deal with Adam being created first, the 12 sons of Israel, and the 12 male disciples. Jesus didn't mind Mary hangin' around but he the writers of the gospel didn't give her much time on the microphone ...is that cookies I smell baking?
I don't care how one dances around this issue, this seems to be the story of the bible. I'm not making this stuff up people! Pam, I'm actually with you, holding your hand, chanting burn this f*cker (idea) down! But the reality is that the weapon of choice for defenders of this idea has always been THE Good Book itself and its really tough to argue with people who hold it to be THE undisputed heavyweight champ of spiritual literature.
So where does that leave us? Where does this problem stem from? Are you going to go after the branches (calling out pastors) or hack away at the roots (redefining the bible). If you choose the latter, you still need to decide whether you go after individual verses or you go after the entire book itself.
I think the hinging question is: Is this really THE Word of God? If not, where does that leave one who considers themselves a Christian? Or Christ follower?
Sincerely,
Your Fellow Truthseeker
The bible also tells us we are allowed to keep slaves and that the universe is geocentric...maybe the bible is a little bit wrong.
@Justin, hey brother! Are you back in town? Aren't you globetrotting for a bit longer??
I really enjoyed our last conversation at The Waypost. Good times.
So, to respond to your post here, I have to first say that I'm unsure if you are truly vexed yourself by these questions and quandaries you present, or if this is a means of generating further discussion knowing that these are indeed very real challenges to the notion of biblical equity for women.
Whatever the intention of your comments, so glad you have brought it up!
I've written about these things before, and I have never brought any scriptures to the table. It's a deliberate omission on my part. I have not been willing to start a sword fight thrusting scriptures left and right to support my POV and annihilate another. Having said that, I am fully aware that biblical interpretation and biblical scholarship are in large part why many xtians are unable to accept the idea of women turned loose to all corners of christendom...
I'm reluctant to go there because past experience has shown me that bible battles can get mean real fast....
However, it really is necessary to confront the question of the bible's role and authority in establishing misogynistic ideology that persists to this day in the 21st century church.
Worthy of a post, really, not a mere comment.
So congratz, Justin, you have succeeded where others have failed, and that is in enticing me to publicly show my hand at armchair biblical scholarship. I very much do have a POV that is compatible with the bible....and in fact, is IMHO, a more accurate rendering of the word of God than the gender inequity defenses of my brothers and sisters. I am not unique, and perhaps as another poster suggested, I am merely spewing some other form of hegemonic posturing that has clouded my thinking. Nonetheless, let's get this party started.
Look out for a post with Bible Verses to appear Soon. It is the dialect of evangelicals. I know it. I am fluent in it. I have chosen not to speak it for a long while...but for the sake of furthering my arguement for the advancement of xtian women I will taste it's flavor once again in my words.
Pam, I too really enjoyed our last conversation and in fact, it has given me the courage to explore truth from a more objective perspective while on my journey through India and beyond. I'm currently in Taiwan and planning to stay here for a little while - providing I find a job.
Regarding my first comment - it was mostly tongue in cheek references to the mentality that you are up against in the quest for equality - and some foundational verses that the idea of male leadership stands on.
IMHO, It seems that the bible is flawed regarding some fundamental issues of morality and human equality... if wrong, then also possibly wrong about the nature of God (since it is supposed to be divinely inspired).
I look forward to reading your upcoming posts and really appreciate the work you've put in reconciling your faith and the bible. Bible wars can get (and will) get mean and history shows us that it can also get bloody. This is probably why I would NEVER have posted such a comment on most faith based blogs - shit, I'd hesitate to write it in a personal email ;) but for the sake of truth....
Pulling counter scriptures to support an argument is where one gets into trouble - because its easy to ignore the scripture in question. I've recently chosen the route of pulling back from the bible in order to look more objectively at God, humanity, morality, beauty, truth, etc....
I love you Pam and am really a fan of your courage to speak out on these issues. Also, I admire you grace in dealing with anonymous short-sighted jabs on the worthiness of your cause. Keep sharing your mind - whether one agrees with you or not - your words are powerful.
I think that when reading the Scriptures (and esp the quoted verses above), the reader might forget that these are writings filtered through both the personal experience and culture in which the author was emersed. Also, the bible itself isn't the "word of G-d" (LOGOS), but rather the LOGOS is the reader's personal experience of Christ as found in the passages... not some hard-lined literalism. We often forget that those pages contain the language of human invention and countless layers of recycled interpretation. It's pointless to outsort religious sexual politics from 2k years ago when they have no place in modern western society.
Post a Comment